Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] |
181. Tech Rebuff - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Richard Desturned wrote: i have another great idea all sov in the game should drop every three months so ~small alliances~ can get a chance Wow never thought I would hear a goon suggest such a wonderful idea..... LOL Now, where did I say ...
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.07.28 13:01:00
|
182. Tech Rebuff - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Again, just cause you want to know about every moon, doesn't mean you need to know about every moon. These numbers are meaningless and at best spread across all of null/low sec. But again, there is the fear factor of the unknown. Null sec is run...
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.07.28 12:59:00
|
183. Tech Rebuff - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So afraid of unknown. We might not be mining the most profitable moon..... Oh no. I need to know I am playing eve right (by the spreadsheet). Sigh. And yes I don't scan moons, as I pointed out, But I understand it is painful. So ask for it to b...
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.07.28 12:49:00
|
184. Tech Rebuff - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I never said complete database. Since they have put work into making one, we should not mess with anything that would nullify this work. Is that what I am hearing? I don't care if there are 1 million moons, you don't need to know about every mo...
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.07.28 12:43:00
|
185. Tech Rebuff - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So the big reason to not to redistribute moons is because some people have a database of current moons and they don't want to make a new one..... I hope to GOD they are not serious. Talk about afraid of change. I don't scan moons, but if it is tru...
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.07.28 12:34:00
|
186. Tech Rebuff - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Make Tech 3 mods. Then I no longer need to worry about tech :) But seriously, the goons will run outta things to do, the alliance will eventually collapse from within due to greed, ambition or boredom. Currently, they have won null sec. It will e...
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.07.27 14:26:00
|
187. What would YOUR priorities be for the Winter Expansion? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
1) POS 2) Ship rebalance 3) Industry
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.07.24 16:35:00
|
188. Eve: Full of Canada haters - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Canada Rocks !!!!! More Toques Less Nukes
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.07.15 01:32:00
|
189. The true flaw in game mechanics - bottlenecks - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I view it as a positive. There should be reasons to the take and control space in 0.0, and resources are a good reason. And without a few bottlenecks (high value resources) all space is the same, and will not be a huge conflict driver. As an ...
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.07.10 13:47:00
|
190. Why do you alt post? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Because I can
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.07.05 03:40:00
|
191. CCP add spreadsheets to EVE - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Or Just use google spreadsheets in your IGB
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.07.04 13:23:00
|
192. FML - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Zoe Athame wrote: Guys, it stands for "**** My Life." How can you spend more than 5 minutes on the internet and not know that? Frequent Memory Lapses?
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.06.29 14:16:00
|
193. Go ahead CCP, listen to the people in the "make null virbant again" th... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Look as long as Nullsec spews constant venomous hatred for hi-sec carebears, they will never head out there in the number you desire. They simply are not wanted, except for moving targets. This is not the problem to making null-sec vibrant. Make...
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.06.21 13:44:00
|
194. Explorer focused character Q's - in Wormholes [original thread]
lots of options depending on the class and size of gang, but I would aim for a tengu for shield fleets. Or a titan I guess :)
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.06.18 02:42:00
|
195. Fixing Technetium - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
corestwo wrote: Pohbis wrote: corestwo wrote: If the intent is that ring mining replace moon mining it will by nature have to extend into lowsec, maybe highsec as well. Linking it to sov would make that difficult, although it could be don...
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.06.16 19:39:00
|
196. Fixing Technetium - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xython wrote: Lady Zarrina wrote: Yes, I think Eve would be improved if you make the null sec alliances want miners in their areas. Having a Tax system like PI on the new moon goo would probably help encourage alliances to want more people...
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.06.15 19:00:00
|
197. Fixing Technetium - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: Lady Zarrina wrote: Weaselior wrote: I'd like to point out that largely the only thing you can spend money on to increase your defenses are supercaps: nerf supercaps and isk doesn't buy defense. Well I agree, but if th...
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.06.15 16:36:00
|
198. Fixing Technetium - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: I'd like to point out that largely the only thing you can spend money on to increase your defenses are supercaps: nerf supercaps and isk doesn't buy defense. Well I agree, but if they nerf supers, the rich will just be able ...
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.06.15 16:24:00
|
199. Fixing Technetium - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yes, I think Eve would be improved if you make the null sec alliances want miners in their areas. Having a Tax system like PI on the new moon goo would probably help encourage alliances to want more people (including industrial types) in their r...
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.06.15 16:07:00
|
200. Least used ship in Eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Electronic attack frigate
- by Lady Zarrina - at 2012.06.02 00:07:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |